Synthesizing the Relationship between Reported Dissonance and Post-Purchase Responses in High Involvement Decisions Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
Abstract: This study develops and validates a scale to assess the impact of reported dissonance on post-purchase responses (attitude change, trivialisation, selective exposure, justification) respectively and applies the instrument to high involvement consumers. A sample of 200 new motor vehicle buyers who purchased from a leading and reputable motor vehicle company in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, was drawn using stratified random sampling based on range of motor vehicle (bottom, middle, top) and month of purchase. Initially, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to extract the factors. The reliability of the modified questionnaire was then assessed using Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha. Thereafter, confirmation factor analysis (CFA) was used to establish if the measurement model is a good fit and to develop and test the model structure in SEM, which generated a good model fit. Pearson r was computed to assess the relationship amongst the dimensions. Using structural equation modelling, the results support significant inverse relationships between reported dissonance and attitude change, trivialisation and justification respectively. Whilst the inverse relationship between reported dissonance and selective exposure was supported using correlation, it was not confirmed using SEM. Recommendations, based on the findings, are presented and are directed at reducing reported dissonance and effectively managing post-purchase interactions and responses.
Keywords: Post-purchase evaluation, reported dissonance, attitude change, trivialisation, selective exposure, justification
Brijball, S. (2003). The level of importance attached to price and quality in purchasing behaviour. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(1), 93-99. Brijball, S. (2000). Consumers’ perceptions of personal decision-making: Its relation to cognitive dissonance. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 26(2), 37-43. Brijball Parumasur, S. & Parumasur, N. (2016). Scale development, validation and use of structural equation modelling to test the impact of consumer confidence and persuasibility on dissonance. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 8(1), 58-68. Brijball Parumasur, S. & Roberts-Lombard, M. (2012). Consumer Behaviour (2nd ed), Cape Town, South Africa: Juta and Company Ltd. Brown, G. H. (1961). The Automobile Buying Decision within the family, In Nelson, N. Foote ed. Household Decision-making (pp. 193-100), New York: University Press. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit, In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162), Newsbury Park, CA: Sage. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Cooper, J. & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory, In L. Berkowitz (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 229-266. Orlando, FL: Academic. Donoghue, S., de Klerk, H. M. & Ehlers, L. (2008). Consumers’ perception of the functional and symbolic performance failure of major electrical household appliances. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences, 36, 40-48. du Plessis, P. J. & Rousseau, G. G. (2003). Buyer Behaviour: A multi-cultural approach (3rd ed), Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Dubey, A. D. (2014). Young consumers’ decision-making behaviour towards casual wear buying in Uttar Pradesh, India, Amity Global Business Review, February, 56-62. Engel, J. F. (1963). Are Automobile purchasers dissonant consumers? Journal of Marketing, 27, 55-58. Engel, J. F. & Blackwell, R. D. (1982). Consumer Behavior (4th ed), Chicago: The Dryden Press. Ehrlich, D., Guttman, I., Schonbach, P. & Mills, J. (1957). Post Decision Exposure to Relevant Information. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 98-102. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance, Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson. Frey, D. (1982). Different levels of cognitive dissonance, information seeking and information avoidance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1175-1183. Frey, D., Kumpf, M., Irle, M. & Gniech, G. (1984). Re-evaluation of decision alternatives dependent upon the reversibility of a decision and the passage of time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14(4), 447-450. Geva, A. & Goldmann, A. (1991). Duality in consumers’ post-purchase attitude. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12(1), 141-164. Ginter, J. L. (1974). An experimental investigation of attitude change and choice of a new brand. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 30-40. Goethals, G. R. & Cooper, J. (1975). When dissonance is reduced: The timing of self-justificatory attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 261-367. Greenwald, H. J. (1969). Dissonance and relative versus absolute attractiveness of decision alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 328-333. Hansen, T. (2005). Perspectives on consumer decision making: An integrated approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(6), 420-437. Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J. & Coney, K. A. (2001). Consumer behaviour: Building marketing strategy (8th ed), Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. Hawkins, D. I. & Mothersbaugh, D. L. (2013). Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy (12th ed), New York, NY: McGraw-Hill International Edition. Heitmann, M., Lehmann, D. R. & Hermann, A. (2007). Choice goal attainment and decision and consumption satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 234-250. Hoelzl, E., Pollai, M. & Kastner, H. (2011). Hedonic evaluations of cars: Effects of payment mode on prediction and experience. Psychology and Marketing, 28(11), 1113-1127. Horton, R. L. (1984). Buyer Behaviour: A Decision-Making Approach, United States of America: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Hoyer, W. D., MacInnis, D. J. & Pieters, R. (2013). Consumer Behavior (6th ed), Australia: South-Western Cengage Learning. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. Koklič, M. K. & Vida, I. (2009). A strategic household purchase: Consumer house buying behaviour. Managing Global Transitions, 7(1), 75-96. Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 212-215. Ladhari, R. (2007). The effect of consumption emotions on satisfaction and word-of-mouth communication. Psychology and Marketing, 24, 1085-1108. Lamb, C. W., Jr., Hair, J. F., Jr., McDaniel, C., Boshoff, C. & Terblanche, N. S. (2008). Marketing (3rd South African ed), Cape Town, Southern Africa: Oxford University Press. Laufer, D. (2002). Are antecedents of consumer dissatisfaction and consumer attributions for product failures universal? Advances in Consumer Research, 29(1), 312-317. Lord, C. G., Ross, L. & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109. Lowe, R. & Steiner, I. (1968). Some effects of the reversibility and consequences of decisions on post-decision information preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 172-179. Ndubisi, N. O. & Ling, T. Y. (2006). Complaint behaviour of Malaysian consumers. Management Research News, 29(1/2), 65-76. Peter, J. P. & Olson, J. C. (2010). Consumer Behavior & Marketing Strategy (9th ed), Boston: McGraw-Hill. Schiffman, L. & Kanuk, L. (2014). Consumer Behaviour: Global and Southern African Perspectives, Cape Town, South Africa: Pearson. Schiffman, L. G. & Wisenbalt, J. L. (2015). Consumer Behavior (11th ed), Boston: Pearson. Simon, L., Greenberg, J. & Brehm, J. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 247-260. Solomon, M., Bamossy, G., Askegaard, S. & Hogg, M. K. (2006). Consumer Behaviour: A European Perspective (3rd ed), Harlow, England: Prentice Hall, Financial Times. Soscia, I. (2007). Gratitude, delight, or guilt: The role of consumers’ emotions in predicting postconsumption behaviors. Psychology and Marketing, 24, 871-894. Traylor, M. B. (1981). Product involvement and brand commitment. Journal of Advertising Research, 21(6), 51-56. Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling, In B.G. Tabachnick & L.S. Fidell (2001), Using Multivariate Statistics (4th ed, pp. 653- 771), Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Van der Walt, A., Strydom, J. W., Marx, S. & Jooste, C. J. (1996). Marketing Management (3rd ed), Republic of South Africa: Juta and Company, Ltd. Venkatesan, M. (1973). Cognitive Consistency and Novelty Seeking, In S. Ward & T.S. Robertson (Eds), Consumer Behavior: Theoretical Sources, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Walters, C. G. & Bergiel, B. J. (1989). Consumer Behaviour: A Decision-Making Approach, Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Company. Wang, Q. & Shukla, P. (2013). Linking sources of consumer confusion to decision satisfaction: The role of choice goals. Psychology and Marketing, 30(4), 295-304. Wicklund, R. A. & Brehm, J. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance, Hillsdate, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Wilkie, W. L. (1990). Consumer Behaviour (2nd ed), New York: John Wiley and Sons. Wright, E. F., Rule, B. G., Fergusan, T. J., McGuire, G. R. & Wells, G. L. (1992). Misattribution of dissonance and behaviour-consistent attitude change. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 24(4), 456-464. Zajonc, R. B. (1960). The concepts of balance, congruity and dissonance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 280-296. Zaltman, G. & Wallendorf, M. (1983). Consumer Behaviour: Basic Findings and Management Implications, New York: John Wiley and Sons. Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J. & Gremler, D. D. (2006). Services Marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm, Boston: McGraw-Hill.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Author (s) should affirm that the material has not published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. IFRD will be the holder of copyright of published articles and we prefer authors to assign copyright to IFRD. Copyright assignment has the advantage for the needs of the scholars. Since there is a need to keep record of the scholarly work, which has been edited, peer-reviewed and accepted in a journal, which confers a recognized, legitimate status on an article. For these reasons, we need these rights to assure the scholars and readers that they are using the genuine research work. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. Editorial team at IFRD solely edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.